{"id":11513,"date":"2014-08-21T19:14:05","date_gmt":"2014-08-22T02:14:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/oslc.nineplanetsllc.com\/blog\/publication\/the-secondary-school-advisor-as-mentor-and-secondary-attachment-figure\/"},"modified":"2014-08-21T19:14:05","modified_gmt":"2014-08-22T02:14:05","slug":"the-secondary-school-advisor-as-mentor-and-secondary-attachment-figure","status":"publish","type":"publication","link":"https:\/\/www.oslc.org\/es\/blog\/publication\/the-secondary-school-advisor-as-mentor-and-secondary-attachment-figure\/","title":{"rendered":"The secondary school advisor as mentor and secondary attachment figure."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The teacher-student relationship is vital to student outcomes in secondary school. Unfortunately, the transition from elementary to secondary school is associated with a decrease in the quality or supportiveness of this relationship. In response, some secondary schools implement advisory programs, in which a teacher\/advisor meets periodically with a small group of students over an extended period. This study examined whether students (N=209) in two small secondary schools would nominate the advisor as part of their attachment hierarchy. Our results indicated that 40% of the sample considered their advisor to be a secondary attachment figure; further, those that did nominate their advisor reported greater engagement in school and demonstrated greater gains in achievement and adjustment compared to those who did not. A relationship assessment instrument from the attachment literature (RSQ) was found to be more efficacious at predicting student outcomes when compared to instruments used in previous mentoring and relationship research.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_seopress_analysis_target_kw":"","site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}}},"publication_keyword":[],"research_type":[],"class_list":["post-11513","publication","type-publication","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":{"citation":"Van Ryzin, M. J. (2010). The secondary school advisor as mentor and secondary attachment figure. <i>Journal of Community Psychology, 38, <\/i> 131-154.","publication_year":"2010","scientists":[11005]},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oslc.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publication\/11513","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oslc.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publication"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oslc.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/publication"}],"acf:post":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oslc.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/scientist\/11005"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oslc.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11513"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"publication_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oslc.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publication_keyword?post=11513"},{"taxonomy":"research_type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oslc.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/research_type?post=11513"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}